When choosing coaxial cables for radio frequency (RF) applications, the debate often comes down to LMR 400 vs RG213. Both cables are reliable and widely used, but they serve slightly different purposes depending on the installation environment and performance goals. Let’s explore their characteristics, differences, and which one stands out for your specific needs.
Construction and Design
LMR 400 and RG213 both use a 50-ohm impedance, ideal for RF communication systems. However, LMR 400 uses a solid copper-clad aluminum center conductor, while RG213 employs a stranded copper conductor. Because of this, LMR 400 is stiffer but offers lower signal loss, whereas RG213 is more flexible and easier to handle during installation.
Moreover, LMR 400 features foil and braided shielding, giving it superior protection against interference. In contrast, RG213 relies on a single braided shield, which is less effective at rejecting noise. As a result, LMR 400 delivers better signal integrity, especially over longer runs.
Signal Loss and Frequency Range
When it comes to attenuation, LMR 400 performs significantly better. For instance, at 100 MHz, LMR 400 has a loss of roughly 1.5 dB per 100 feet, while RG213 loses about 2.8 dB. This difference grows at higher frequencies, meaning LMR 400 retains more signal power for high-frequency transmissions such as Wi-Fi, cellular repeaters, and satellite links.
Because of its low loss, LMR 400 supports frequencies up to 6 GHz, while RG213 typically handles up to 1 GHz effectively. Therefore, if you’re running high-bandwidth or modern digital RF systems, LMR 400 is the better performer.
Comparing Velocity Factors: LMR 400 vs RG213
The velocity factor (VF) of a coaxial cable tells us how fast a signal travels through the cable compared to the speed of light in a vacuum. A higher velocity factor means the signal moves faster, which often results in better timing accuracy and slightly less signal delay, especially useful in high-frequency or phase-critical applications.
LMR 400 Velocity Factor
LMR 400 has a velocity factor of approximately 0.85 (or 85%). This means electromagnetic waves inside the cable travel at about 85% of the speed of light. The high VF is achieved thanks to its foam polyethylene dielectric, which reduces capacitance and allows signals to move more efficiently.
RG213 Velocity Factor
RG213, on the other hand, has a velocity factor around 0.66 (or 66%). This slower transmission speed results from its solid polyethylene dielectric, which has higher dielectric constant values and greater signal delay compared to foam-based materials.
Practical Impact of the Difference
Because LMR 400 has a significantly higher velocity factor, signals transmitted through it experience less phase shift and lower latency over the same distance. This can make a noticeable difference in long cable runs or systems that require precise synchronization, such as phased antenna arrays, GPS distribution, or timing-sensitive RF systems.
However, for short cable runs (say, under 10 feet), the delay difference is negligible. But as cable length increases, LMR 400 maintains not only faster signal propagation but also lower loss, giving it a clear technical edge.
Summary of Velocity Factors
| Cable Type | Dielectric Type | Velocity Factor | Relative Signal Speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMR 400 | Foam Polyethylene | 0.85 (85%) | Faster signal travel |
| RG213 | Solid Polyethylene | 0.66 (66%) | Slower signal travel |
Verdict
In terms of velocity factor, LMR 400 clearly outperforms RG213. Its foam dielectric enables faster propagation and lower signal distortion, making it the superior choice for long-distance and high-frequency RF communication systems.
Power Handling Comparison: LMR 400 vs RG213
When choosing between LMR 400 and RG213, understanding their power handling capacity is essential. Power handling determines how much RF energy a cable can carry before heat buildup or dielectric breakdown occurs, both of which can degrade performance or damage the cable.
LMR 400 Power Handling
LMR 400 is designed for high-efficiency, low-loss transmission, which directly enhances its power-handling capabilities. At 30 MHz, it can typically handle around 1,800 watts of power under continuous operation.
However, as frequency increases, the power-handling capacity decreases because RF heating and dielectric losses become more significant. For instance:
- 150 MHz: ~900 watts
- 450 MHz: ~600 watts
- 1 GHz: ~400 watts
The foam polyethylene dielectric and excellent shielding help keep heat generation low, allowing LMR 400 to safely handle high power over extended periods, especially in well-ventilated installations.
RG213 Power Handling
RG213, being an older but still reliable design, has a power rating of about 1,250 watts at 30 MHz. Its solid polyethylene dielectric retains heat more easily, so power-handling capacity declines more sharply at higher frequencies:
- 150 MHz: ~600 watts
- 450 MHz: ~350 watts
- 1 GHz: ~200 watts
Although RG213 is flexible and rugged, it loses efficiency when transmitting high-power RF signals for long durations, especially outdoors or in warmer environments.
Factors Affecting Power Handling
Both cables’ ratings can vary depending on:
- Ambient temperature: Higher heat reduces safe power limits.
- Cable length: Longer runs accumulate more loss and heat.
- Ventilation: Proper airflow around the cable improves thermal dissipation.
- Connector quality: Poor connections increase resistance and local heating.
In well-designed systems, maintaining good airflow and using high-quality connectors can maximize each cable’s power capability.
Summary of Power Handling
| Frequency | LMR 400 Power (Watts) | RG213 Power (Watts) |
|---|---|---|
| 30 MHz | 1,800 | 1,250 |
| 150 MHz | 900 | 600 |
| 450 MHz | 600 | 350 |
| 1 GHz | 400 | 200 |
Verdict
LMR 400 clearly surpasses RG213 in power handling, especially as frequency rises. Its modern materials and low-loss design let it manage higher wattage with less heat buildup. Therefore, if your system involves high-power RF transmission, repeater stations, or long-distance antenna feeds, LMR 400 is the more robust and reliable choice.
Durability and Weather Resistance
Both cables are durable, yet their jackets differ. RG213 often uses PVC, which is flexible but can degrade under prolonged UV exposure. Conversely, LMR 400 uses a polyethylene jacket that’s UV-resistant and designed for harsh outdoor environments. Consequently, LMR 400 lasts longer in direct sunlight and extreme weather, making it ideal for permanent outdoor installations.
Installation and Handling
Despite its performance edge, LMR 400’s rigidity can make it challenging to install in tight spaces or around corners. RG213, being more flexible, is easier to work with in confined setups, especially when mobility or frequent repositioning is required. Thus, installers often prefer RG213 for temporary systems or short indoor cable runs.
Cost and Value
Cost-wise, LMR 400 is generally more expensive due to its advanced shielding and materials. However, its lower loss and higher efficiency often justify the higher price, especially in applications where every decibel of performance matters. For budget-conscious users who prioritize flexibility over peak performance, RG213 remains a solid alternative.
Which Is Better?
Ultimately, the better choice depends on your needs. If you want superior performance, minimal signal loss, and weather resistance, choose LMR 400. It’s perfect for long-distance, outdoor, or high-frequency setups like antennas, base stations, or wireless bridges.
If you need flexibility, ease of handling, and a lower upfront cost, RG213 is a dependable and practical option for short or indoor connections.
Final Thoughts
With LMR 400 vs RG213, both have proven their value in RF communications. Yet, as technology evolves and demands for higher frequencies grow, LMR 400 stands out for its efficiency and durability. Investing in higher-quality coax like LMR 400 not only improves signal performance but also ensures reliability for years to come.
Please consider Donating to help support this channel